Notes on an unidentified lestes found in yard on July 12, 2010

I’m learning that identification of individuals in the genus lestes presents a bit of a challenge, and that some simply can’t be identified in the field. This young male that came to the yard last summer is a case in point.

Characteristics

  • Large (~2 inches long) damsel with wings held at 45° angle.
  • Male (accessory sex organ on S2)
  • Legs: Dark/black
  • S9: Blue
  • S8–S10: Swollen, whitish ventrally
  • Wings: Dark stigma bordered with white
  • Eyes: Brown, blue postocularly
  • Face: Looks brownish
  • Abdomen dorsal: S3–S6 Metallic greenish (aqua-marine sheen), S7–S8 brownish, S10 dark; white ventrally, dark band at base of segments
  • Cerci: Hard to see what shape they are in photo taken from above, but they are clearly visible.

Amber-winged was suggested as a possibility, but I’m not sure:

  • Pro: Coloration of S3-S6 (aqua-marine sheen); dark band at base of abdominal segments; abdomen white ventrally; pruinosity on S9; fairly robust appearance
  • Con: Clearly visible cerci; lack of blue bands on lateral thorax of what apparently is NOT a mature individual; pruinosity ONLY on S9

Here are some photos, the quality of which isn’t good enough to do more than provide certainty about genus:

More yard odonates

There was another hard-to-identify (for me) damsel in the yard yesterday evening. It and a Fragile Forktail seemed to be settling in for the night in the patch of switchgrass in the northeast corner of the backyard. I’m guessing that it was a Familiar Bluet. According to Rosche, Semroc, and Gilbert (Dragonflies and Damselflies of Northeast Ohio, 2nd ed.),

The dorsal surface of the female’s abdomen is mostly black. The segment joints at the bases of S3–S8 are nearly ringed with pale coloration. These rings, coupled with the pale areas of the lateral surface, usually give the impression of dark, torpedo-like designs.

This damselfly has the pale rings, and on S7 a perfect torpedo is visible (although not so much so in the thumbnail).

  • Familiar Bluet  (Enallagma civile)—I think · July 14, 2010 · Backyard

Because of unwellness and resulting lack of sleep last night, I wasn’t up until 7:30 this morning and missed my usual early prowl around the garden. It was already 82° when I got up and 100° around 30 minutes ago—unpleasant.

Cloudywings

Update, July 31, 2007: I showed the photo to Jim Z. last Thursday, and he said that it’s a Southern with a darker than usual face. He had had only a brief view in the field. Digital cameras are truly a butterflier’s friend.

I’ve been on the web looking at photos and reading descriptions of Northern and Southern Cloudywings and have also reviewed the photos in Glassberg; Kaufman; and Heitzman. The result is that I’m still in doubt about the identification of the cloudywing Jim Z. and I saw last weekend.

Descriptions

All emphases are the authors’.

Face

The Horseshoe Lake (HL) individual, pictured in the previous post, clearly lacks the extremely light lower side of the face of the Southerns shown in Glassberg and Kaufman. Glassberg describes the face of the Southern as “white or pale gray” (p. 150), whereas Kaufman describes it as “often pale” (p. 260); Heitzman doesn’t mention the face, and his photos are of the dorsal side of specimens.

Of the Northern’s face, Glassberg says that it is “dark brown or dark gray”, and Kaufman says that it is “often dark”.

Antennal club

Both Glassberg and Kaufman mention white at the bend of the antennal club. Glassberg: “Southern Cloudywings have a white patch just where the antennal clubs bend,…” Kaufman: “[A]ntennal clubs may have a white spot at the bend.” Both mention the absence of a white patch in the Northern. Heitzman doesn’t mention the white patch or its absence.

Both Kaufman and Heitzman mention the costal fold in the Northern and its absence in the Southern. Because I have no idea what the costal fold looks like, despite having looked at the diagrams in the guides of the three authors and at images on the internet, I don’t know whether or not the HL cloudywing has one.

Wing spots

Glassberg describes the wing spots of the two cloudywings as follows:

Southern Cloudywings have more extensive and aligned spots than do Northern Cloudywings. Note especially the 2nd spot from the FW margin. This spot is prominent and hourglassed [sic] shaped in Southern Cloudywings but is usually a small dot or absent in Northern Cloudywings.

Kaufman, Southern:

Above dark brown with glassy white spotband on forewing broad and aligned. Row of small white spots near tip of forewing forms a straight line (summer) or has the bottom spot slightly offset outward (spring).

Kaufman, Northern:

Above dark brown with tiny triangular white spots on forewing reduced and not aligned with each other.

The second spot from the forewing margin in the HL cloudywing is prominent, but looks only vaguely hourglass shaped to me.

Internet findings

Identified as a Northern (right-hand photo)—the face looks roughly as dark as that the HL cloudywing:
www.birdsofoklahoma.net/NorthernCloudywingButterfly.htm
Identified as a Southern (bottom photo)—the face looks roughly as light as that of the HL cloudywing:
www.carolinanature.com/butterflies/scloudywing.html
Identified as a Northern (second photo)—the face looks much darker than that of the HL cloudywing:
www.carolinanature.com/butterflies/ncloudywing.html
Discussion and photos of Northern:
zipcodezoo.com/Animals/T/Thorybes_pylades.asp
Discussion and photos of Southern:
zipcodezoo.com/Animals/T/Thorybes_bathyllus.asp

Identification?

Butterflying is still fairly new to me, and I have virtually no experience with the skippers—hence I have no intuitions to guide me. Based on what I’ve read in the three guides and on the internet photos, I’m leaning (somewhat tentatively) back toward Southern Cloudywing. Jim hasn’t yet seen the photo.

(There is a third possibility, which I’ve decided against: Confused Cloudywing. According to Heitzman, this is “very local and uncommon in southern and eastern Missouri”. Also, the descriptions of white spots in both Kaufman and Glassberg seem to rule out this species—both also mention the absence of white at the bend of the antennal club.)

Snow birds

Ah, the wonderfully variable junco. One of the males in the yard has dapper white wing bars. Sibley on page 501 states that one in two hundred “have wing-bars as prominent as White-winged”. This is clearly a Slate-colored—it’s the same size as the other juncos in the yard and its throat and face are uniformly dark, but it has those nice, white wing bars.

Thirteen species have visited the yard so far today:

  1. Rock Pigeon
  2. Mourning Dove
  3. European Starling (around 18)
  4. Northern Cardinal (1 male and 1 female)
  5. White-throated Sparrow (4 or 5)
  6. Song Sparrow (1, a beautiful representative of the species, with extensive buff-tan sides and flanks, and dark, crisp streaks)
  7. Dark-eyed Junco (4 or 5)
  8. Brown-headed Cowbird (1 male and 1 female)
  9. Red-winged Blackbird (1 adult male)
  10. Common Grackle (1)
  11. House Finch (6 or so)
  12. American Goldfinch (3)
  13. House Sparrow (around 100)